In today's interconnected digital landscape, data can cross borders in milliseconds. However, the legal frameworks governing that data don't move as seamlessly. Every country has its own approach to data handling, privacy, and government access.
Understanding where your data resides and which legal jurisdictions can compel access to it is critical for:
Laws like the US CLOUD Act and China's Data Security Law claim authority over data regardless of where it's stored, creating overlapping and sometimes conflicting legal obligations.
Different countries have vastly different standards for how government agencies can access private data, from requiring judicial warrants to having few restrictions on intelligence agency access.
Country-specific economic restrictions can directly impact what data services can be provided to certain jurisdictions, creating complex compliance challenges.
Many countries now require certain types of data to be stored within their national borders, creating complex infrastructural requirements.
The US CLOUD Act allows US authorities to compel US-based providers to produce data regardless of where it's stored, potentially conflicting with GDPR's restrictions on data transfers.
Requires operators of "critical information infrastructure" to store personal and important data within China, with strict cross-border transfer assessment requirements.
Federal Law No. 242-FZ requires that Russian citizens' personal data be stored on servers physically located in Russia, impacting any global service with Russian users.
Juri provides a comprehensive assessment of jurisdictional risks for any domain, IP address, or .onion address. By analyzing:
We calculate a GLARS (Geo-Legal Access Risk Score) to help you identify and mitigate potential jurisdictional conflicts before they become compliance problems.